Search the Archives

RFC 1459: Nice protocol, but lacking some fundamentals needs in...

Reader comments:

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 1459

Comment by Capitaine
Submitted on 7/28/2005
Related RFC: RFC 1459
Rating: Not yet rated	Rate this comment:
Nice protocol, but lacking some fundamentals needs in comparison with HTTP.No session authentication handling, no charset/language negotiation with clients.